VERIFICATION OF EMPIRICAL MODELS OF SIMPLEX METHOD COMPLEXITY USING THE MODIFIED GMDH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2026.01.02Keywords:
simplex method, model self-organization, modified Group Method of Data Handling, least squares method, redundant representation, regularity criterion, data standardizationAbstract
This paper presents the results of constructing an empirical dependence of the number of arithmetic operations of the standard simplex method as a function of the problem dimensionality defined in canonical form. To address this problem, the principle of model self-organization based on a modified combinatorial algorithm of the Group Method of Data Handling is applied. The modification of Group Method of Data Handling consists in forming a residual representation that is assumed to contain the sought empirical complexity function, as well as in applying a preliminary partitioning algorithm for the basis functions, which are additively included in the residual representation, into two non-overlapping classes: the class of main dominant components and the class of refining residual components. This approach significantly reduces the combinatorial search procedure. Based on theoretical complexity estimates available in the literature, a redundant set of basis functions was constructed. Five fundamental models were considered: Borgwardt’s polynomial estimate, the Adler – Megiddo quadratic bound, a basic polynomial form, the smoothed analysis model of Spielman – Teng, and a general mixed model previously proposed by the authors. To expand the search space, a logarithmic component was added to the basis functions. Thus, the residual representation includes six basis components, along with all their squares and pairwise products. The optimal structure was selected using a symmetric regularity criterion by evaluating more than 134 million alternative models, the number of which is uniquely determined by the cardinality of the set of refining residual components. To ensure the correct application of the least squares method for strongly nonlinear regressors of different scales (whose absolute values differ by several orders of magnitude), the necessity of scaling input data by their standard deviation, with optional centering, was experimentally justified. The efficiency of this approach was confirmed through a specially designed experiment with a known ideal solution, including a constant term (bias) at the order of 100000 and normally distributed noise with an amplitude of 1 % of the mean value of the ideal regression on the values of the input variables of the experiment. The results of simulation modeling on a dataset of 13690 randomly generated linear programming problems demonstrate the clear superiority of the mixed polynomial-logarithmic structure within the extended class of candidate functions.
References
Pavlov A., Lishchuk K., Melnikov O., Kyselov M., Hu C. Mathematics and software for coordinated planning using aggregated linear volume-time models of discrete manufacturing systems. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS). 2025, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2025.04.01.
Pavlov A. A., Kushch A. V. Algorithms for constructing a regression linear with respect to unknown coefficients on a limited amount of experimental data. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu "KhPI". Seriia: Systemnyi analiz, upravlinnia ta informatsiini tekhnolohii: zb. nauk. prats [Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: System analysis, control and information technology: Collection of scientific papers]. Kharkiv, NTU "KhPI" Publ., 2025, no. 2 (14), pp. 8–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2025.02.02.
Dadush D., Huiberts S. Smoothed analysis of the simplex method. Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms / Ed. by T. Roughgarden, Cambridge University Press Publ., 2021, pp. 309– 333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108637435.019.
Pavlov A. A., Holovchenko M. N., Drozd V. V., Shargorodskyi V. S. Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti modyfikovanoho metodu urakhuvannia arhumentiv dlia pobudovy bahatovymirnykh rehresii, zadanykh nadlyshkovym opysom [Improving efficiency of the modified group method of data handling for constructing multivariate regressions given by a redundant representation]. Adaptyvni systemy avtomatychnoho upravlinnia [Adaptive systems of automatic control]. 2025, vol. 1, no. 46, pp. 257–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/1560-8956.46.2025.323833. (In Ukr.).
Marquardt D. W., Snee R. D. Ridge regression in practice. The American Statistician. 1975, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1975.10479105.
Ahsan M. M., Mahmud M. A. P., Saha P. K., Gupta K. D., Siddique Z. Effect of data scaling methods on machine learning algorithms and model performance. Technologies. 2021, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9030052.
Moroz O. H., Stepashko V. S. Comparative features of MIA GMDH and deep feed-forward neural networks. Cybernetics and Computer Engineering. 2021, no. 4 (206). pp. 5–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt206.04.005.
Adler I., Megiddo N. A simplex algorithm whose average number of steps is bounded between two quadratic functions of the smaller dimension. Journal of the ACM (JACM). 1985, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 871–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/4221.4222.
Borgwardt K.-H. The average number of pivot steps required by the simplex method is polynomial. Zeitschrift für Operations Research. 1982, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 157–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01917108.
Klee V., Minty G. J. How good is the simplex algorithm? Inequalities-III. New York, Academic Press Publ., 1972, pp. 159– 175.
Spielman D. A., Teng S. H. Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time. Journal of the ACM (JACM). 2004, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 385–463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/990308.990310.
Voulgaropoulou S., Samaras N., Ploskas N. Predicting the execution time of the primal and dual simplex algorithms using artificial neural networks. Mathematics. 2022, vol. 10, p. 1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071038.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).