COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY AND FORMAL MODELS OF EXPERT ESTIMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2019.01.01Keywords:
combinatorial optimization, uncertainty, compromise criteria, compromise conditions, empirical matrix of pairwise comparisons, consistent decisionAbstract
Previously, the author formalized the concepts of uncertainty, compromise solution, compromise criteria and conditions for a quite general class of combinatorial optimization problems. The functional of the class’ problems contains linear convolution of weights and arbitrary numerical characteristics of a feasible solution. It was shown that the efficiency of the presented algorithms for the uncertainty resolution is largely determined by the efficiency of solving the combinatorial optimization problem in a deterministic formulation. A part of the formulated compromise criteria and conditions uses expert weights. Previously, the author and his disciples also formulated combinatorial optimization models, optimality criteria, criteria for decisions’ consistency. The models allow to evaluate and justify the degree of stability and reliability of the estimated values of empirical coefficients using a formally ill-conditioned empirical pairwise comparison matrix of arbitrary dimension. The matrix may contain zero elements. The theoretical research and statistical experiments allowed to choose the most efficient of these optimization models. In this article, on the base of earlier results by the author and his disciples, we formalize and substantiate the efficiency of the proposed sequential procedure for expert estimation of weights that determine compromise criteria and conditions. The procedure is an integral part of the algorithm introduced by the author to solve combinatorial optimization problems under uncertainty of the mentioned class. We give unified algorithm for efficient uncertainty resolution that includes original and efficient formal procedure for expert coefficients’ estimation using empirical matrices of pairwise comparisons.References
Pavlov A.A. Optimization for one class of combinatorial problems under uncertainty. Adaptyvni systemy avtomatychnoho upravlinnya: mizhvidomchyy nauk.-tekhn. zbirnyk [Adaptive systems of automatic control: interdepartmental scientific-technical collection of papers]. Kiev, NTUU "KPI" Publ. Vol. 1, no. 34 (in press)
Zgurovsky M. Z., Pavlov A. A. Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Planning and Decision Making: Theory and Applications. Cham, Springer, 2019. 526 p. Chapter 8. The four-level model of planning and decision making, pp. 347–406. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98977-8_8
Zgurovsky M. Z., Pavlov A. A. Prinyatie resheniy v setevykh sistemakh s ogranichennymi resursami [Decision making in network systems with limited resources]. Kiev, Nauk. dumka Publ., 573 p.
Burkov V. N., Bushuev S. D., Vvoznyy A. M., Gayda A. Yu., Grigoryan T. G., Ivanova A. A., Knyrik N. R , Kolesnik M. E., Kononenko I. V., Koshkin K. V., Pavlov A. A., Ryzhkov S. S., Ryzhkov A. S., Slobodyan S. O., Tanaka Kh., Chernov S. K. Upravlenie resursami raspredelennykh proektov i programm [Management of the distribute projects and programmes resources]. Nikolaev, Torubara V. V. Publ., 2015. 386 p.
Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw Hil Publ., 1980.
Saaty T. L. Kearns K. Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1985. 216 p. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-03782-6
Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990, vol. 48, iss. 1, pp. 9–26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saaty T. L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1996.
Saaty T. L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, RWS Publ., 1996. 479 p.
Saaty T. L. Analytic Hierarchy Process. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics / eds. P. Armitage and T. Colton. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Publ., 2005. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002
Saaty T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. vol. 1, no. 1, 2008, pp. 83–98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759
Andreychikov A. V., Andreychikova O. N. Analiz, sintez, planirovanie resheniy v ekonomike [Analysis, Synthesis, Decisions Planning in the Economy]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2000. 368 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Bulletin of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: System analysis, control and information technologyAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).