COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY AND FORMAL MODELS OF EXPERT ESTIMATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2019.01.01

Keywords:

combinatorial optimization, uncertainty, compromise criteria, compromise conditions, empirical matrix of pairwise comparisons, consistent decision

Abstract

Previously, the author formalized the concepts of uncertainty, compromise solution, compromise criteria and conditions for a quite general class of combinatorial optimization problems. The functional of the class’ problems contains linear convolution of weights and arbitrary numerical characteris­tics of a feasible solution. It was shown that the efficiency of the presented algorithms for the uncertainty resolution is largely determined by the effi­ciency of solving the combinatorial optimization problem in a deterministic formulation. A part of the formulated compromise criteria and conditions uses expert weights. Previously, the author and his disciples also formulated combinatorial optimization models, optimality criteria, criteria for deci­sions’ consistency. The models allow to evaluate and justify the degree of stability and reliability of the estimated values of empirical coefficients using a formally ill-conditioned empirical pairwise comparison matrix of arbitrary dimension. The matrix may contain zero elements. The theoretical research and statistical experiments allowed to choose the most efficient of these optimization models. In this article, on the base of earlier results by the author and his disciples, we formalize and substantiate the efficiency of the proposed sequential procedure for expert estimation of weights that determine compromise criteria and conditions. The procedure is an integral part of the algorithm introduced by the author to solve combinatorial optimization problems under uncertainty of the mentioned class. We give unified algorithm for efficient uncertainty resolution that includes original and efficient formal procedure for expert coefficients’ estimation using empirical matrices of pairwise comparisons.

Author Biography

Alexander Pavlov, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Full Professor, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine, Head of the Department of Automated Information Processing and Control Systems

References

Pavlov A.A. Optimization for one class of combinatorial problems under uncertainty. Adaptyvni systemy avtomatychnoho upravlinnya: mizhvidomchyy nauk.-tekhn. zbirnyk [Adaptive systems of automatic control: interdepartmental scientific-technical collection of papers]. Kiev, NTUU "KPI" Publ. Vol. 1, no. 34 (in press)

Zgurovsky M. Z., Pavlov A. A. Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Planning and Decision Making: Theory and Applications. Cham, Springer, 2019. 526 p. Chapter 8. The four-level model of planning and decision making, pp. 347–406. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98977-8_8

Zgurovsky M. Z., Pavlov A. A. Prinyatie resheniy v setevykh sistemakh s ogranichennymi resursami [Decision making in network systems with limited resources]. Kiev, Nauk. dumka Publ., 573 p.

Burkov V. N., Bushuev S. D., Vvoznyy A. M., Gayda A. Yu., Grigoryan T. G., Ivanova A. A., Knyrik N. R , Kolesnik M. E., Kononenko I. V., Koshkin K. V., Pavlov A. A., Ryzhkov S. S., Ryzhkov A. S., Slobodyan S. O., Tanaka Kh., Chernov S. K. Upravlenie resursami raspredelennykh proektov i programm [Management of the distribute projects and programmes resources]. Nikolaev, Torubara V. V. Publ., 2015. 386 p.

Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw Hil Publ., 1980.

Saaty T. L. Kearns K. Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems. Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1985. 216 p. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-03782-6

Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990, vol. 48, iss. 1, pp. 9–26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

Saaty T. L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 1996.

Saaty T. L. Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, RWS Publ., 1996. 479 p.

Saaty T. L. Analytic Hierarchy Process. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics / eds. P. Armitage and T. Colton. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Publ., 2005. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002

Saaty T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences. vol. 1, no. 1, 2008, pp. 83–98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759

Andreychikov A. V., Andreychikova O. N. Analiz, sintez, planirovanie resheniy v ekonomike [Analysis, Synthesis, Decisions Planning in the Economy]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2000. 368 p.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Pavlov, A. (2024). COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION UNDER UNCERTAINTY AND FORMAL MODELS OF EXPERT ESTIMATION. Bulletin of National Technical University "KhPI". Series: System Analysis, Control and Information Technologies, (1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2019.01.01

Issue

Section

SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DECISION-MAKING THEORY