EXAMINING SOFTWARE QUALITY CONCEPT: BUSINESS ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2079-0023.2023.02.02Keywords:
software quality, business analysis, requirements, quality in use, internal quality, international standardsAbstract
Software quality is a critical aspect of software development that significantly impacts business performance and customer satisfaction. However, defining software quality can be challenging, as different sources provide various definitions and perspectives. The article presents a literature review of software quality, acknowledging an ongoing debate over the years regarding the definition of software quality and the methods used for its assessment. Among all the different ideas about software quality, the article highlights key concepts that are crucial in understanding software quality: meeting requirements, satisfying users, using software features, and spotting defects. The article also checks out international standards like ISO/IEC 25010:2011 and ISO/IEC 5055:2021, introducing terms such as "Quality in use" and "Structural Quality." Unveiling a tripartite perspective elucidated in international standards—internal quality, external quality, and quality in use - the article underscores the intricate interplay between subjectivity and objectivity. The subjective dimension, influenced by user perception and contextual factors, is juxtaposed with more objective criteria such as conformance to requirements and the absence of defects. The standards provide helpful perspectives, but the human side of things, like user feelings and specific contexts, makes finding a universal definition tricky. The pivotal role of business analysis and requirements engineering in ensuring software quality is underscored. Business requirements, stakeholder needs, and the quality of functional and non-functional requirements emerge as integral components. The article argues that software quality is intricately tied to the quality of its requirements, presenting a dual perspective: compliance with quality criteria and alignment with stakeholders' expectations and business goals. Practical software quality assessment is built upon the foundational understanding of contextual nuances, user needs, and operational conditions, all discerned through business analysis.
References
Cvjetkovic M., Vasiljević M., Cvjetković M., Josimović M. Impact of quality on improvement of business performance and customer satisfaction. Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness. 2021, no. 11. рp. 20–28. DOI: 10.5937/jemc2101020C.
Krasner H. The Cost of Poor Software Quality in the US: A 2020 Report. Consortium for Information and Software Quality. 2021. Available at: https://www.it-cisq.org/the-cost-of-poor-software-quality-in-the-us-a-2020-report (accessed: 20.10.2023).
Kokol P. Software Quality: How Much Does It Matter? Electronics. 2022, no. 11(16), 2485. DOI: 10.3390/electronics11162485.
ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017. Systems and Software Engineering - Software Life Cycle Processes. ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard. 2017, 145 p.
April A., Laporte C. Y. An Overview of Software Quality Concepts and Management Issues. Measuring Information Systems Delivery Quality. 2006, pp. 28-54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-857-4.ch002 (accessed: 25.10.2023).
Nyári N., Kerti A. Review of Software Quality Related ISO Standards. Safety and Security Sciences Review. 2021, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 61–72.
Alebeisat F., Alhalhouli Z., Alshabatat T., Alrawashdeh T. I. Review of Literature on Software Quality. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT). 2018, vol. 8, no. 5, рр. 32–42.
Ndukwe I. G., Licorish S. A., Tahir A., MacDonell S. G. How have views on Software Quality differed over time? Research and practice viewpoints. Journal of Systems and Software. 2023, vol. 195. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111524.
Karl Wiegers. Software Development Pearls. Lessons from Fifty Years of Software Experience. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2021. 330 p.
Quality Glossary. American Society for Quality. Available at: https://asq.org/quality-resources/quality-glossary (accessed: 25.10.2023).
Joseph M. Juran; Joseph A. De Feo. Juran's Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence, Sixth Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2010. 1113 p.
Hussain S., Farid S., Mumtaz I. Is Customer Satisfaction Enough for Software Quality? International Journal of Computer Science and Software Engineering (IJCSSE). 2019, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 40–47.
Petrasch R. The definition of software quality: a practical approach. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering. 1999, pp. 33–34.
Tian J. Software Quality Engineering: Testing, Quality Assurance, and Quantifiable Improvement. IEEE. 2005, 412 p. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/0471722324 (accessed: 28.10.2023).
Nuseibeh B., Easterbrook S .M. Fundamentals of Requirements Engineering. Pearson Education Limited, 2007. 496 p.
Hossain A., Dr. Md. Kashem A., Sultana S. Enhancing Software Quality Using Agile Techniques. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering. 2013, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 87–93.
Suman, Wadhwa M. A comparative study of software quality models. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies. 2014, vol. 5(4), pp. 5634–5638.
ANSI/ASQC A3. Quality systems terminology. American National Standards Institute. Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 1978, 17 p.
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. ANSI/IEEE Std. 729-1983. 1983, 38 p. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.1983.7435207. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7435205 (accessed: 28.10.2023).
IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE Std 610.12-1990. 1990, 83 p. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.1990.101064. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=2238 (accessed: 28.10.2023).
ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. 2011. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html (accessed: 01.11.2023).
ISO 9000:2015. Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary. 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/45481.html (accessed: 01.11.2023).
ISO/IEC 5055:2021. Information technology – Software measurement – Software quality measurement – Automated source code quality measures. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/80623.html (accessed: 01.11.2023).
Gobov D., Yanchuk, V. Network Analysis Application to Analyze the Activities and Artifacts in the Core Business Analysis Cycle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC). 2021, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/IISEC54230.2021.9672373.
A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge. International Institute of Business Analysis, 2015. 512 p.
The PMI guide to business analysis. Project Management Institute, 2017. 444 p.
Norbert, N., András, K. Review of software quality related ISO standards. Safety and Security Sciences Review. 2021, no. 3(2), pp. 61–72.
Gobov D., Titlova O. Towards identifying challenges in business analysis on IT projects–a practical study. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems. 2023, no.2, pp. 193-206. DOI: 10.32620/reks.2023.2.16
Gobov D., Zuieva O. Identifying the dependencies between IT project context and business analysis document content. Innovative technologies and scientific solutions for industries. 2023, no. 2(24), pp. 39–53. DOI: 10.30837/itssi.2023.24.039.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).